artfullpac

• Beyond Fidelity The Dialogics Of Adaptation Pdf Merger

Beyond Fidelity The Dialogics Of Adaptation Pdf Merger

1. Conkie, Rob. “Shakespeare Aftershocks: Shylock.” Shakespeare Bulletin 27, no. 4 (2009): 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Desmet, Christy. “Introduction.” In Shakespeare and Appropriation, edited by Christy Desmet and Robert Sawyer, 1–12. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
3. ———. “Recognizing Shakespeare, Rethinking Fidelity: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Appropriation.” In Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation, edited by Alexa Huang and Elizabeth Rivlin, 41–58. New York: Palgrave, 2014.Google Scholar
4. Dovey, Lindiwe. “Fidelity, Simultaneity and the ‘Remaking’ of Adaptation Studies.” In Adaptation and Cultural Appropriation: Literature, Film, and the Arts, edited by Pascal Nicklas and Oliver Lindner, 162–185. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar
5. Foucault, Michel. “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?” In Dits et écrits I, 1954–1975, edited by D. Défert and F. Éwald, edition Quarto. Paris: Gallimard, 2001.Google Scholar
6. ———. “What is An Author?” In The Foucault Reader, edited by Peter Rabinow, 101–120. New York: Pantheon, 1984.Google Scholar
7. Friedman, Michael. “In Defense of Authenticity”. Studies in Philology, 99, no. 1 (2002): 33–56.Google Scholar
8. Garber, Marjorie Garber. Shakespeare and Modern Culture. New York: Pantheon Books, 2008.Google Scholar
9. Henderson, Diana E. “The Romance of King Lear: Genre and Modernity in Hobson’s Choice and Life Goes On.” Litteraria Pragensia: Studies in Literature and Culture, 26, no. 52 (2016): 49–57. Special issue on “Versions of King Lear,” edited by Martin Procházka, Michael Neill, and David Schalkwyk.Google Scholar
10. ———. “Shake-shifting: An Introduction.” In Collaborations with the Past: Reshaping Shakespeare across Time and Media, 1–38. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2006.Google Scholar
11. Hermansson, Casie. “Flogging Fidelity: In Defense of the (Un)Dead Horse.” Adaptation, 8, no. 2 (2015): 147–160.Google Scholar
12. Hurst, Rochelle. “Adaptation as an Undecidable: Fidelity and Binarity from Bluestone to Derrida.” In In/Fidelity: Essays on Film Adaptation, 172–196. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2008.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, Samuel. “Preface to the Edition of Shakespeare’s Plays (1765).” In Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare, edited by H.R. Woudhuysen, 120–165. New York: Penguin, 1989.Google Scholar
14. Lanier, Douglas. “Post-Textual Shakespeare.” Shakespeare Survey, 64 (2011): 145–162.Google Scholar
15. ———. “Shakespearean Rhizomatics: Adaptation, Ethics, Value”. In Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation, edited by Alexa Huang and Elizabeth Rivlin, 21–40. New York: Palgrave, 2014.Google Scholar
16. Leitch, Thomas. “Fidelity Discourse: Its Cause and Cure”. In In/Fidelity: Essays on Film Adaptation, edited by David L. Kranz and Nancy C. Mellerski, 205–208. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2008.Google Scholar
17. ———. “Twelve Fallacies in Contemporary Adaptation Theory.” Criticism, 45, no. 2 (2003): 149–171.Google Scholar
18. Mallin, Eric. “Jewish Invader and the Soul of State: The Merchant of Venice and Science Fiction Movies.” In Shakespeare and Modernity: Early Modern to Millennium. Edited by Hugh Grady, 142–167. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
19. ———. “Out of Joint: Memento as Contemporary Hamlet.” Journal of Narrative Theory, 40, no. 3 (2010): 297–337.Google Scholar
20. “Panel Presentations and Discussion: 'The Persistence of Fidelity.' In In/Fidelity: Essays on Film Adaptation, 197–212. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2008.Google Scholar
21. Raitt, George. 2010. “Still Lusting After Fidelity?” Literature/Film Quarterly, 38, no. 1: 47–58.Google Scholar
22. Scott-Douglass, Amy. “The Bard and the Blockbuster: Seeing Shakespeare in the Films of George Lucas and Sam Raimi.” Unpublished paper, International Shakespeare Conference, Stratford-upon-Avon, UK, 2014.Google Scholar
23. Stam, Robert. “Beyond Fidelity: The Dialogics of Adaptation.” In Film Adaptation, edited by James Naremore, 54–76. New York: Athlone, 2000.Google Scholar
24. True to the Spirit: Film Adaptation and the Question of Fidelity, ed. Colin McCabe, Kathleen Murray, and Rick Warner. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2011.Google Scholar
25. Warren, Robin. “Hamlet Rides among the Seminoles.” Southern Cultures, 7, no. 4 (2001): 32–63.Google Scholar
26. Welsh, James M. “Adaptability: Questioning and Teaching Fidelity.” In The Pedagogy of Adaptation, edited by Dennis Cutchins, Lawrence Raw, and James M. Welsh, 97–108. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow P, 2010.Google Scholar
27. Worthen, William. Shakespeare Performance Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2014.Google Scholar

Apr 29, 2012. Fidelity in Adaptation A substantial number of critical analyses exist on the topic of film adaptations of literary works that were written in the second half of. To criticize both, and to rewrite the original; in this sense translation provides a collaborative experience that goes beyond that of the two initial texts. Because of that, Robert Stam in his chapter “Beyond Fidelity: The Dialogics of Adaptation”. 11 Stam develops his theories of intertextual dialogism and adaptation filters in other works such as Film Theory. An interesting subgenre in which we can see the way in which reality and fiction are merged. Is adaptation truly an adaptation.pdf - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Article on the film Adaptation.